When it comes down to it, most of us who love our men have a preference as to whether the gent has a foreskin or not. There have even been several studies on whether or not there is a difference in pleasure between a guy who is circumcised vs. uncircumcised.

One of these studies in Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality done by Queen’s University took 196 men and women and asked them questions about their sex life. Trying to find a correlation between pleasure and whether or not they had been circumcised. Women tend to lean towards the circumcised look while men preferred their partners to be “oh natural”. However, this was all to do with the look, not with the pleasure factor.

Iranian-girl

But, it does change the way men make love. Yes, there is a difference. Men who are circumcised tend to rock the “jack hammer” style of sex. Trying to get the most sensation at the tip of the private part through hard, fast thrusts. Whereas men who still have their foreskin, find a slow steady rhythm. The foreskin moves over the private part with each thrust, this creates pleasure for our guys so they don’t have to go so hard. This is the only real pleasure difference between the two.

In the end, you aren’t going to kick a guy to the curb just because he is or isn’t circumcised. So whether or not he is, really doesn’t matter.
Click here for the article source!